ETHICAL CHALLENGES OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION IN JUSTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31732/2708-339X-2025-17-C17Keywords:
: algorithmic bias, digital transformation of justice, personal data protection, automation of court processes, ethical regulation of technologies, principles of a fair trial, international digitalization experience.Abstract
. The relevance of this study lies in exploring the ethical challenges associated with the digital transformation of justice, which is an integral part of the modern development of the judicial system. The use of artificial intelligence, algorithmic systems, and automation in court processes enhances the eficiency and transparency of justice, but simultaneously creates risks of discrimination, data privacy violations, and impacts on traditional principles of legal proceedings. In particular, algorithmic bias, arising from the use of historical data, can reproduce social inequalities, which contradicts the principles of fairness and equality before the law. Additionally, the increasing volume of electronic data poses threats to the confidentiality and privacy of individuals involved in court proceedings. The purpose of this research is to identify and analyze the ethical challenges of the digital transformation of justice, assess their impact on the principles of a fair trial, and develop recommendations for the ethical regulation of digital technologies in the judicial system.
The analysis methods include comparative legal analysis, a systemic approach, quantitative and qualitative research methods, as well as the study of international experience - particularly the practices of countries such as Estonia, the Netherlands, the USA, Canada, the UK, and Singapore. The obtained results confirm that algorithmic bias, data privacy violations, and the impact on traditional principles of justice are key challenges. To address these, the study proposes the implementation of independent algorithm audits, the development of legislative mechanisms for regulating digital decisions, ensuring transparency in court processes, and integrating international data protection standards.
The practical value of the research lies in forming the basis for a national strategy for the ethical digitalization of justice, aimed at ensuring fairness, transparency, and trust in the judicial system in the context of global technological change.
References
Engvin D., Larson D., Mattu S., Kirchner L. Mashynna uperezhzenist. ProPublica. 2016. URL: https://www. propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Shtuchnyy intelekt v ES i Velykiy Brytaniyi: porivnyannya rehulyatornykh pidhodiv. Dnistryanskyy tsentr. 2023. URL: https://dc.org.ua/news/shtuchnyy-intelekt-v-es-i-brytaniyi-porivnyannya-regulyatornyh-pidhodiv (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Basiuk O. P. Rekomendatsiyi shchodo vprovadzhennya tekhnolohiy rozpodilenoho reyestru (blokcheyn) u derzhavnomu sektori Ukrayiny na osnovi svitovoho dosvidu. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnya. 2023. № 1. P. 131–154. DOI: 10.26565/1684-8489-2023-1-08.
Bielov D. M., Bielova M. V. Shtuchnyy intelekt u sudovomu protsesi ta sudovykh rishennyakh: potentsial i ryzyky. Uzhhorodskyy natsionalnyy universytet. 2023. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373627051_Artificial_ intelligence_in_judicial_proceedings_and_court_decisions_potential_and_risks/fulltext/64f34ba3827074313ff23093/
Artificial-intelligence-in-judicial-proceedings-and-court-decisions-potential-and-risks.pdf (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Buolamwini J., Gebru T. Genderni vidtinky: mizhsektoralni vidminnosti v tochnosti komertsiyinykh system klasyfikatsiyi za statyu. Pratsi konferentsiyi z mashynnoho navchannya. 2018. Vol. 81. P. 1–15. URL: http://proceedings. mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Artificial intelligence for higher education: benefits and challenges. Frontiers in Education. 2024. URL: https:// www.frontiersin.org/journals/education/articles/10.3389/feduc.2024.1501819/full (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Tsyfrova derzhava: alhorytm uspikhu vid Singapuru. UASpectr. 2020. URL: https://uaspectr.com/2020/12/21/ algorytm-uspihu-vid-singapuru/ (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Yevropeyska komisya z efektyvnosti pravosuddya (CEPEJ). Etychna khartiya shchodo vykorystannya shtuchnoho intelektu v sudovykh systemakh. 2018. URL: https://www.coe.int/en/web/cepej/ethical-charter (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Bilʹshe 12 000 osib buly profilʹovani defektnym instrumentom prohnozuvannya politsiyi Darema. Fair Trials.
predictive-ai-tool/ (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Zahalʹnyy rehulyament zakhystu danykh (GDPR). Yevropeysʹkyy parlament i Rada. 2016. URL: https://eur-lex. europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32016R0679 (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Holovatsʹkyy N. T. Pravove rehulyuvannya zakhystu personalʹnykh danykh: GDPR ta ukrayinsʹke zakonodavstvo. Visnyk yurydychnoho fakultetu Uzhhorodsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu. 2024. № 44. P. 1–10. URL: https://visnyk-juris-uzhnu.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/44-1.pdf (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Mizhnarodnyy dosvid vykorystannya tsyfrovoyi informatsiyi v kryminalʹnomu protsesi. Journal of Legal Studies. 2019. № 4. URL: http://www.lsej.org.ua/4_2019/61.pdf (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Kovalʹchuk O. Ya. Pravovi ramky zastosuvannya shtuchnoho intelektu v sudoviy systemi. Internauka. URL: https://www.inter-nauka.com/uploads/public/17179636116454.pdf (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Larson D., Engvin D., Mattu S., Kirchner L. Alhorytmichni otsinky ryzyku u kryminalʹniy yustytsiyi: uroky z debativ navkolo COMPAS. Harvard Data Science Review. 2022. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 1–25. DOI: 10.1162/99608f92.1e2b3a1a. 15.Obermeyer Z., Powers B., Fogeli K., Mullainathan S. Analiz rasovoyi uperezhzenosti v alhorytmi, shcho vykorystovuyetsya dlya upravlinnya zdorovyam naselennya. Science. 2019. Vol. 366. № 6464. P. 447–453. URL: https://
science.sciencemag.org/content/366/6464/447 (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Ocheretyanyy V. V., Osisky Y. O. Tsyfrova transformatsiya sudovykh posluh v Ukrayini: dosyahnennya ta perspektyvy. Vinnytsʹkyy navchalʹno-naukovyy instytut ekonomiky Zakhidnoukrayinsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu. 2024. URL: http://www.lsej.org.ua/4_2024/162.pdf (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Paskar A. Etychni aspekty vykorystannya shtuchnoho intelektu v pravosuddi: shlyakh do zabezpechennya prav lyudyny. Naukovyy zhurnal Chernivetsʹkoho natsionalʹnoho universytetu imeni Yuriya Fedʹkovycha. 2023. URL: https:// journals.chnu.chernivtsi.ua/index.php/main/article/download/70/52/103 (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Petryshyn O. V., Hilyaka O. S. Prava lyudyny u tsyfrovu epokhu: vyklyky, zahrozy ta perspektyvy. Visnyk Natsionalʹnoyi akademiyi pravovykh nauk Ukrayiny. 2021. Vol. 28. № 1. P. 7–35.
Bernazyuk Ya. Tsyfrova era pravosuddya: rolʹ shtuchnoho intelektu u zabezpechenni yednosti sudovoyi praktyky v Ukrayini. Protocol. 2023. URL: https://protocol.ua/ru/tsifrova_era_pravosuddya_rol_shi_u_zabezpechenni_ ednosti_sudovoi_praktiki_v_ukraini/ (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Bilyy dim vyrobyv rekomendatsiyi shchodo zakhystu hromadyan vid shtuchnoho intelektu. MediaSapiens.
URL: https://ms.detector.media/trendi/post/30381/2022-10-04-bilyy-dim-vyrobyv-rekomendatsii-shchodo-
zakhystu-gromadyan-vid-shtuchnogo-intelektu/ (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Tlyopova-Demura M. Vykorystannya alhorytmiv shtuchnoho intelektu u kryminalʹniy yustytsiyi: mizhnarodnyy dosvid ta vitchyznyani perspektyvy. 2021. URL: https://www.academia.edu/80992767/ (accessed: 06.07.2025).
Zgama A. O. Tsyfrova transformatsiya pravosuddya ta perspektyvy dlya biznesu. Analitychna ta porivnyalʹna yurysprudentsiya. 2024. № 320. P. 320–325.
Zyuderven Borgezius F. Y. Dyskryminatsiya, shtuchnyy intelekt i alhorytmichne pryyattya rishenʹ. Rada Yevropy. 2018. URL: https://rm.coe.int/discrimination-artificial-intelligence-and-algorithmic-decision-making/1680925d73 (accessed: 06.07.2025).

Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Горєлова В.Ю.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.