OBJECTIVE SIGNS OF SPECIALLY QUALIFIED INTENTIONAL MURDER: LIMITS OF INTERPRETATION AND PROBLEMS OF APPLICATION
Keywords:
intentional murder; especially qualified murder; objective elements of a criminal offense; qualifying features; judicial practice; corpus delicti; aggravating circumstances; criminal law qualification; qualification errorsAbstract
The article is devoted to a comprehensive study of the objective elements of especially qualified intentional murder, as well as to determining the limits of their interpretation and identifying problems of law enforcement in modern criminal law practice. The relevance of the topic is обусловлена the increased social danger of this type of criminal offense, the complexity of its legal qualification, and the inconsistency of judicial practice regarding the establishment and interpretation of the objective elements of the corpus delicti.
The study provides a theoretical analysis of intentional murder as a key category of criminal law, with further identification of its especially qualified forms. The main focus is placed on the objective side of the criminal offense, including such elements as a socially dangerous act (action or omission), consequences in the form of death, a causal link between the act and the result, as well as additional qualifying features established by criminal legislation.
The specifics of such characteristics as the method of committing the murder, the number of victims, particular cruelty, commission of the offense for selfish motives, with the purpose of concealing another crime, as well as other aggravating circumstances are examined. The problems of their interpretation are revealed, in particular cases of expansive or restrictive approaches in judicial practice, which may lead to errors in legal qualification.
Special attention is paid to the issue of establishing causation in complex situations where death results from a combination of factors or actions of several persons. The article also analyzes the difficulties of distinguishing especially qualified intentional murder from related criminal offenses, in particular from intentional grievous bodily harm resulting in death, as well as from murder committed under mitigating circumstances.
The study also addresses problems of law enforcement caused by the vagueness of certain legislative provisions, the lack of uniform judicial approaches, and the influence of evaluative legal concepts requiring further doctrinal clarification. Based on the analysis of judicial practice and scientific sources, proposals are formulated for improving criminal law norms and unifying their interpretation.
The necessity of clearly defining the limits of interpretation of the objective elements of especially qualified intentional murder is substantiated, which will contribute to improving the quality of criminal law qualification, ensuring the principle of legality, and achieving uniformity of judicial practice.
References
Фріс П.Л. Кримінальне право України. Загальна частина: підручник для студентів вищих навчальних закладів. Київ: Атіка, 2009. 512 с. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2225
Науково-практичний коментар до Кримінального кодексу України. Під загальною редакцією Потебенька М.О., Гончаренка В.Г. К : «ФОРУМ» 2001 у 2-х т. 1. 1020 с. URL: https://newcriminalcode.org.ua/upload/media/2021/01/18/kontrolnyj-proekt-kk-17-01-2021.pdf
Чеботарьова Г.В. Кримінально-правова охорона правопорядку у сфері медичної діяльності: автореф. дис. докт. юрид. наук: спец. 12.00.08. НАН України, Інститут держави і права ім. В.М. Корецького. К: 2011. 49 с. URL: https://nrat.ukrintei.ua/searchdoc/0511U000924/
Короленко М. П. Кваліфікація і класифікація умисних вбивств при обтяжуючих обставинах: дис. канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.08. Одеса, 2002. 189 с. https://irbis nbuv.gov.ua/cgi bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=S&I21DBN=EC&P21DBN=&S21CNR=20&S21COLORTERMS=0&S21FMT=JwU_B&S21P01=0&S21P02=0&S21P03=U%3D&S21REF=10&S21STN=1&S21STR=%D0%A5881.9%284%D0%A3%D0%9A%D0%A0%29112.1%24&Z21ID
Ігнатов О. М. Насильство як спосіб вчинення злочину: поняття та сутність. Форум права. 2010. № 3. С. 144-155. URL: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-journals/FP/2010-3/10iomptc.pdf
Про судову практику в справах про злочини проти життя та здоров’я особи. Постанова Пленуму Верховного Суду України від 7 лютого 2003 р. № 2. Верховна Рада України. URL: http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v0002700-03
Євдокімов Д. С. Застосування оціночних понять в сучасному кримінальному праві. Юридичний журнал. 2009. № 6. С. 45-50. URL: http://www.justinian.com.ua/article.php?id=3231
Готра Г.Ю. Особливості кримінальної відповідальності за умисне вбивство при обтяжуючих обставинах. 206 с. URL:https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/lib/17452/1/pdf
Киричко В. М. Унікальний посібник з кримінального права України. X: Право. 2015. 1088 с. URL:https://pravo‑izdat.com.ua/image/data/Files/147/1‑57.pdf
