CONFIDENTIALITY PRINCIPLE IN MEDIATION AND ITS EXCEPTIONS IN LATVIA

Authors

Keywords:

mediation, confidentiality principle, exceptions from confidentiality, vertical confidentiality, horizontal confi- dentiality.

Abstract

The article analyses confidentiality principle in mediation and its exceptions in Latvia. Since 2014, when Mediation Law was adopted in Latvia, a number of mediated disputes has significantly increased. Although from the surface a principle of confidentiality seems to be with explicit content and clear borderlines, nevertheless theory and practice shows zones of still undefined concepts, which until now have not been analysed in Latvia. The object of the research is a concept of confiden- tiality principle. The aim of this work is to analyse scope of subjects of confidentiality principle, and elaborate on preconditions to for exceptions from mediation confidentiality. Methods of scientific and professional literature review, document and comparative analysis, as well as interview method was applied in this research. The topic of the article is discovered both from theoretical and practical aspect.

References

Administratīvā procesa likums [Administrative Procedure Law]. Latvian law. Adopted on 25.10.2001.

Alexander, N., Walsh, S., Svatos, M. (eds.) (2017), EU Mediation Law Handbook. Regulatory Robustness Ratings for Mediation Regimes. Walters Kluwer: p. 8-9.

Autortiesību likums [Copyrights Law]. Latvian law. Adopted on 06.04.2000.

Bērnu tiesību aizsardzības likums [Children Rights Protection Law]. Latvian law. Adopted on 19.06.1998.

Bērtaitis, S. (2009), Kāda būs mediācija Latvijā? Saldo: No. 3.

Civilprocesa likums [Civil Procedure Law]. Adopted on 14.10.1998.

Council of Certified Mediators of Latvia. Decision No. 4. Adopted on 31.03.2017. On renewal of certificate. Not pub- lished.

Dillard, G. (2002) The Future of Mediation Confidentiality in Texas: Shedding Light on a Murky Situation. 21 Rev. Litig: p. 138.

Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and Council of 21.05.2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters.

Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and Council of 26.02.2014 on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licencing of rights for online use in the internal market.

Hanaway, M. (2021) Psychologically Informed Mediation. Studies in Conflict and Resolution. London, New York: Rout- ledge: p. 23.

Kriminālprocesa likums [Criminal Procedure Law]. Latvian law. Adopted on 21.04.2005.

Kronis, I. (2007) Civiltiesisko strīdu alternatīvs risinājums. Jurista Vārds: No. 3 (456).

Latvijas Republikas Advokatūras likums [Advocacy Law of the Republic of Latvia]. Latvian Law. Adopted on 27.04.1993. 15. Litvins, G. Alternatīvās tiesību aizsardzības un strīdu risināšanas metodes administratīvajā procesā [The alternative law enforcement and dispute resolution methods in the administrative proceeding]. Doctoral thesis. Defended in 2012. Available at: https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/5128

Downloads

Published

2021-02-06

How to Cite

Dr. Rone Dana, & MPA Kīsnica Ivita. (2021). CONFIDENTIALITY PRINCIPLE IN MEDIATION AND ITS EXCEPTIONS IN LATVIA. Legal Bulletin, 11–19. Retrieved from https://lbku.krok.edu.ua/index.php/legal-bulletin/article/view/310

Issue

Section

Turiba University, Riga, Latvia